Archaeology Magazine Archive

A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America

Special Introductory Offer!


Beyond Stone & Bone

On Archaeology’s Front Line in Atlanta
by Heather Pringle
April 24, 2009

800px-atlanta_centre_villeThis week more than 3000 archaeologists from around the world are converging on Atlanta, Georgia, to chat up their latest research at the Society for American Archaeology annual meeting. For five brief days, conversations in the corridors of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis hotel will be studded with esoteric talk of Basketmaker II coprolites, Dorset slate tools, and human remains from Belize’s Midnight Terror Cave. (The latter, I think, wins the prize for the coolest name for an archaeological site.)

Archaeologists are fond of complaining about the SAA meeting. Each participant gets just 15 minutes at the podium to present what might be years or even decades of hard work, and session organizers ruthlessly police these time limits. The media is equally ambivalent. Reporters must dash frantically back and forth between thirty or more sessions in an afternoon, cellphones in hand as they relay findings to their editors and scramble to ferret out the best story.

I’m following the conference from afar this year, but I spent several pleasant hours yesterday thumbing through 400-odd pages of SAA abstracts. I was amazed by the scope of the new research.

Curse Tablets from Roman Carthage. Archaeologists have long studied the inscriptions on these homely looking pieces of metal, fascinated by the ways in which ordinary people appealed to the gods to influence human events. Now University of Georgia archaeometallurgist Sheldon Skaggs has done something different, analyzing the metal in 90 curse tablets from Carthage to see where it came from. The tablets, he discovered, were made of Tunisian lead, suggesting that the Romans were mining a lead ore known as galena in the African colony.

An Upper Class Delicacy. The lowly sea urchin, a creature resembling a pin cushion, litters ancient coastal refuse-heaps around the world. But archaeologists seldom pay it much attention, viewing it as a meal of last resort for prehistoric peoples. Not true, says Victoria Stosel, an archaeologist at California State University. Stosel has finished a new study on sea urchins, finding evidence of them in places as important and diverse as the Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore on the acropolis of ancient Corinth and in an elite burial cave in the Aleutian Islands. She now thinks these creatures —which are rich in calcium, phosphorus, iron, and vitamins A, B1, B2 and B12—were prized foods of the elite in many parts of the ancient world.

Birds of a Feather. Some have called the scarlet macaw, a resident of the subtropical rainforests of Central America, one of the world’s most beautiful birds. More than five centuries ago, the inhabitants of Paquime in arid northern Mexico raised these birds for their scarlet and light blue feathers, which could be traded far and wide. But archaeologists have long debated the source of these birds, whose northernmost habitat lies 300 miles to the south. Did the Paquimeños breed them or obtain them from southern traders? A new study by an Arizona State University team led by Andrew Somerville sheds key new light. By studying the bone chemistry of macaw skeletons from Paquime, the team found that the Paquimeños did indeed breed most of the birds –an early example of aviculture in the Americas.

I think 2009 is a very strong year for research at the SAA and I’ll present more of the findings in blogs to come.

Comments posted here do not represent the views or policies of the Archaeological Institute of America.

6 comments for "On Archaeology’s Front Line in Atlanta"

  • Reply posted by Rob Sternberg (April 28, 2009, 9:35 am):

    I’ve commented in my blog that there seems to have been minimal media coverage of this meeting. This surprises me. Do you have any thoughts on why that is? I enjoy your entries, Rob

         

  • Reply posted by Heather (April 28, 2009, 3:03 pm):

    Hi Rob:

    The financial downturn in general and the declining readerships for newspapers and magazines in particular are certainly to blame. At the moment, the traditional media are having trouble springing for travel expenses for their writers–something I encounter a fair bit in my own work. And the digital media seldom have any travel budgets at all for writers. As a result, important conferences like the SAA meeting pass with hardly a ripple.

    I’ll just mention that, in addition to this blog, I managed to cover the SAA session on Drought and the Maya Collapse for Science magazine.

         

  • Reply posted by Daniel Molitor (April 30, 2009, 6:17 am):

    I wonder how many of the major media outlets, print or digital, have come to rely primarily on scientists’ own press releases for their stories? I can see an editor having to weigh the expense of sending a reporter to the SAA conference vs. running a story, complete with prepackaged photos and clips, sent out with predictable regularity by your Zahi Hawasses and other archaeo-stars. Nothing against Mr. Hawass, mind you. He knows how to draw attention to his work and that inevitably gets people interested. But how many other archaeologists (or astronomers or biologists, for that matter) have the resources to draw similar attention?

    Thanks for writing about the SAA, Heather. As an interested amateur, I enjoy the highlights!

         

  • Reply posted by Heather (April 30, 2009, 8:01 am):

    I don’t think that we should let archaeologists off the hook so easily. It’s part of their ethical responsibilities to communicate their findings to the public, and few archaeologists have a good sense of how to do this. It’s not enough to give a good paper on their results at the SAA: archaeologists have find other ways of communicating their findings. The new media–YouTube, Twitter, etc–make this much, much easier. But very few archaeologists are availing themselves of the opportunities. Why not?

         

  • Reply posted by Brian (April 30, 2009, 8:02 am):

    I find it distressing that while the overwhelming majority of papers presented at SAA concern archaological research conducted in the US, these topics are barely ever mentioned. This blog posting is a testament to that. For the thousands of archaeologists that labor everywhere from small contract companies to state and federal agencies to academic departments across the country, SAAs are the biggest forum where they could ever hope to present their research.

         

  • Reply posted by Dan Hilborn (April 30, 2009, 10:02 am):

    I’d be interested to know if the local TV station, CNN, sent anybody.
    (I never saw any coverage on my TV.)

    And the Atlanta Journal Constitution is generally a very good daily newspaper that covers other archaeology stories. (The biggest banner ad on their website today features a traveling King Tut exhibit.) But a quick search of the ajc.com website reveals NOTHING about the SAA conference.)

    And I always thought stories about mummies, ancient monuments, and valuable lost artwork could actually help sell newspapers (or draw TV viewers).

         


About Our Blogger:

Heather Pringle is a freelance science journalist who has been writing about archaeology for more than 20 years. She is the author of Master Plan: Himmler's Scholars and the Holocaust and The Mummy Congress: Science, Obsession, and the Everlasting Dead. For more about Heather, see our interview or visit www.lastwordonnothing.com.

Thanks for writing! While we may not be able to respond to every message, we appreciate your comments and suggestions. (Comments are now closed.)


RSS feed
Trowel Tales: The AIA Blog


Advertisement


Advertisement