For those of us tracking the evolution of biochemical research and peptide science, staying informed about the metrics of leading publications is essential. When evaluating the academic standing of the journal *Neuropeptides*, the impact factor serves as a vital benchmark for quality and reach. As of the latest data updates in 2025, the impact factor for the journal *Neuropeptides* is 2.7.
Academic Metrics and Journal Standing
The scientific community relies on these metrics to gauge the influence of published research. According to current records, the 2025 impact factor for Neuropeptides is 2.7. This figure, often analyzed alongside the 5-year impact factor of 2.5, places the journal within a respected quartile, typically identified as Q2 in various bibliometric databases.
When conducting a deeper analysis of the impact factor, it is helpful to look at the historical trajectory. For instance, while some specialized journals like *IJNP has an Impact Factor of 3.7*, the consistency shown by *Neuropeptides*—maintaining a steady 2.7—highlights its sustained relevance in the fields of endocrinology, pharmacology, and neuroscience. Other related publications, such as those focusing on bone metabolism, may boast a 4.8 impact factor, but these often reflect niche, high-citation research topics.
The Role of Neuropeptides in Modern Research
Beyond the impact factor, the actual substance of the research published is what drives interest. Neuropeptides are foundational signaling molecules that interac by XY Yeo · 2022 · Cited by 65 — In this review, we examine the natural roles of neuropeptides in the modulation of neurological function and the development of neurological disorders. t with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). My personal interest in these substances stems from their complex roles in physiological regulation. Whether exploring how neuropeptides also control wound healing or their involvement in metabolic pathways, the depth of current literature is vast.
For researchers and enthusiasts, databases like NeuroPep 2.0 have become indispensable. With over 11,000 unique entries, this resource provides the granular data necessary to understand individual neuropeptide functions. It is fascinating to see how digital tools are bridging the ga Galanin (GAL), a neuropeptide produced in both the central and peripheral nervous systems, is implicated in various physiological processes, p between theoretical research and practical application.
Analyzing Trends and Data
When reviewing the impact factor: 2.700 (based on recent Web of Science data), it is clear that the journal remains a cornerstone for those studying:
* Neuropeptide receptor interacti Neuropeptides as regulators of bone metabolism ons.
* Pharmacological modulation of neurological functions.
* Systemic effects on developmental pathways.
As we look toward the future, the 2025 data confirms that the journal is not just Journal Impact Factor (JIF):. 2.7. 5-year Impact Factor: 2.5. Best ranking: NEUROSCIENCES ║ Percentage rank: 44.6%. Open Access Support: Hybrid and Open Access a repository of historical findings but a platform for ongoing discovery. The impact of these small proteins—ranging from substance P to complex signaling chains—continues to be a subject of intense academic scrutiny.
Conclusion: A Consistent Benchmark
In the world of scientific publishing, the 2.7 metric is a testament to the rigorous peer-review process maintained Potentials of Neuropeptides as Therapeutic Agents for by the editorial board. For anyone looking to understand the current state of the field, the 2025 report offers a clear picture: Neuropeptides *Neuropeptides* remains a vital, reliable source of information. By focusing on high-quality submissions and maintaining a stable impact factor, the journal ensures that the global community has access to the most accurate data regarding the physiological roles of these essential signaling molecules.