PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA—Jeffrey Schwartz of the University of Pittsburgh argues in the latest issue of Science that the current system of categorizing the human fossil record into genus and species is too narrow for understanding our complex evolutionary history. He said in a press release that “the boundaries of both the species and the genus remain as fuzzy as ever, new fossils having been haphazardly assigned to species of Homo, with minimal attention to morphology.” Schwartz suggests that anthropologists begin again. “If we want to be objective, we shall almost certainly have to scrap the iconic list of (genus and species) names in which hominid fossil specimens have historically been trapped and start from the beginning,” he said. For more on hominid evolution, go to “Our Tangled Ancestry.”
Rethinking the Form and Structure of Hominid Fossils
News August 28, 2015
Recommended Articles
Top 10 Discoveries of the Decade January/February 2021
Neanderthal Genome
Vindija Cave, Croatia, 2010
Artifacts November/December 2019
Australopithecus anamensis Cranium
Features September/October 2017
The Heights We Go To
The links among extreme environments, genetics, and the human ability to adapt
Digs & Discoveries January/February 2017
Hungry Minds
-
Features July/August 2015
In Search of a Philosopher’s Stone
At a remote site in Turkey, archaeologists have found fragments of the ancient world’s most massive inscription
(Martin Bachmann) -
Letter from Virginia July/August 2015
Free Before Emancipation
Excavations are providing a new look at some of the Civil War’s earliest fugitive slaves—considered war goods or contraband—and their first taste of liberty
(Library of Congress) -
Artifacts July/August 2015
Gold Lock-Rings
(Courtesy Amgueddfa Cymru-National Museum of Wales) -
Digs & Discoveries July/August 2015
A Spin through Augustan Rome
(Courtesy and created at the Experiential Technologies Center, UCLA, ©Regents of the University of California)