WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA—The International Business Times reports that scientists led by archaeologist and biostatistician Erik Otárola-Castillo of Purdue University have developed a method to analyze the often ambiguous marks on animal bones recovered from archaeological sites. The tiny marks left by prehistoric hunters can be difficult to distinguish from marks made by other kinds of damage. The shallow marks left by stone tools are often “V” shaped, while those made by trampling animal hooves are usually “U” shaped. The new technique, which employs 3-D imaging, shape analysis, and Bayesian statistics, was shown to identify butchery marks made by volunteers with stone tools 88 percent of the time—a major improvement in accuracy over old methods, Otárola-Castillo said. For more on prehistoric hunting, go to “Letter From Montana: The Buffalo Chasers.”
New Technique Analyzes Prehistoric Cut Marks
News December 6, 2017
SHARE:
Recommended Articles
Digs & Discoveries March/April 2021
Lady Killer
Courtesy Randy Haas
(Produced by N Velchoff ©The Gault School of Archaeological Research)
Digs & Discoveries January/February 2017
Proteins Solve a Hominin Puzzle
(Courtesy Marian Vanhaeren)
Digs & Discoveries January/February 2017
The Monkey Effect
(Adobestock)
-
Features November/December 2017
Reading the White Shaman Mural
Paintings in a Texas canyon may depict mythic narratives that have endured for millennia
(Chester Leeds, Courtesy Shumla) -
Letter From Singapore November/December 2017
The Lion City's Glorious Past
The founding mythology of this city-state was once thought to be pure fiction—archaeology says otherwise
(Courtesy John Miksic) -
Artifacts November/December 2017
Phoenician Mask Mold
(Courtesy Michael Jasmin) -
Digs & Discoveries November/December 2017
The Hidden Stories of the York Gospel
(© Chapter of York)