New Thoughts on the Impact of the Plague of Justinian

News December 3, 2019

SHARE:

ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND—Environmental historians Lee Mordechai and Merle Eisenberg of the University of Maryland argue that the outbreak of bubonic plague during the reign of Roman Emperor Justinian in the mid-sixth century A.D. was not a catastrophic event across the Mediterranean region, according to a Science News report. Historians have long blamed the Justinianic plague outbreak as a contributing factor in the decline of the Roman Empire. But Mordechai and his colleagues cite historical texts and archaeological evidence—including a lack of increase in the number of mass graves, the continued cultivation of farmland near eastern Mediterranean trade routes, few plague references in historical texts and stone inscriptions, and stable coin circulation during the sixth century—as support for the idea that the outbreak of disease had a modest impact on social structure. Additionally, samples of the Yersinia pestis bacteria obtained from sixth century skeletons have not been found to be ancestral to the strain of Y. pestis responsible for the devastation of the Black Death in the fourteenth century. To read about an earlier form of the Y. pestis bacterium that was circulating almost 4,000 years ago, go to "Bronze Age Plague," one of ARCHAEOLOGY's Top 10 Discoveries of 2018.

  • Features November/December 2019

    Artists of the Dark Zone

    Deciphering Cherokee ritual imagery deep in the caves of the American South

    Read Article
    (Alan Cressler)
  • Letter from Jordan November/December 2019

    Beyond Petra

    After the famous city was deserted, a small village thrived in its shadow

    Read Article
    (Robert Bewley/APAAME)
  • Artifacts November/December 2019

    Australopithecus anamensis Cranium

    Read Article
    (Dale Omori/Cleveland Museum of Natural History)
  • Digs & Discoveries November/December 2019

    Proof Positive

    Read Article
    (Erich Lessing/Art Resource)